What began as an effort to catch a mysterious thief pocketing cash from the till has resulted in a $580,000 malicious prosecution verdict against Wolf Camera.

Atlanta sole practitioner David P. Smith says his client, Arthur Royter of Atlanta, brought the suit because managers at his former job persuaded Gwinnett County authorities to prosecute Royter for theft without revealing evidence that would have cleared him. Royter v. Wolf Camera No. 97VS0134401-C (Fult. St. Ct., March 24, 2000).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]