A federal judge in California rejected a motion to dismiss a case filed against the Educational Testing Service by Oakland-based Disability Rights Advocates over ETS's policy of flagging scores obtained under special conditions. The case alleges that ETS's policy of flagging scores obtained under nonstandard circumstances are discriminatory toward people with disabilities.
April 13, 2000 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Northern District of California Judge William Orrick Jr. has rejected a motion to dismiss a case filed against the Educational Testing Service by Oakland-based Disability Rights Advocates over ETS’s policy of flagging scores obtained under special conditions.
The case was filed in San Francisco federal court late last summer, alleging that ETS’s policy of flagging scores obtained under nonstandard circumstances are discriminatory toward people with disabilities. Orrick made his ruling March 27.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
