CLOSEClose Law.com Menu
 
X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A husband who obtained a divorce or “Get” from a rabbinical court in Israel and persuaded legal authorities there to forbid his wife from leaving Israel unless she submitted to the court’s authority has been fined $10,000 and assessed more than $12,000 to pay his wife’s attorney fees and expenses. Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice William Rigler ruled that the husband, by initiating the legal action in Israel after the wife filed for divorce in the United States, “attempted to thwart the tenor and spirit of [a court order and] divest the court of its asserted jurisdiction” over the marriage. The wife, Rachel Schaeffer, in Schaeffer v. Schaeffer, 23111/99, commenced a divorce action in 1999. Later that year, the husband, Allan Schaeffer, stipulated to a court order allowing his wife to travel to Israel, with the couple’s children, for a wedding in her family. Ms. Schaeffer then sought a contempt finding since her husband failed to make support payments. Mr. Schaeffer did not appear for a hearing on the motion. When Ms. Schaeffer went to Israel to attend the marriage of her brother, she found herself in a bind, since the rabbinical court issued a restraining order barring her from leaving Israel unless she signed an affidavit discontinuing divorce proceedings in New York. Mr. Schaeffer had secured a Get, the equivalent of a divorce decree, from the rabbinical court in Israel in the months preceding his wife’s trip to the country. Justice Rigler said that Mr. Schaeffer had manipulated events to place his wife in the position of having to submit to the rabbinical court’s authority and dismiss her divorce proceedings in New York. “The central focus of this dispute is the activity planned and executed by the defendant-husband, designed to circumvent this court’s order,” Rigler wrote. “Defendant-husband … signed a stipulation that was to allow the plaintiff-wife to travel for a happy family occasion. Instead of honoring his agreement, made in court, he carried out a plan to divest this court of its jurisdiction.” Rigler sanctioned Mr. Schaeffer $10,000, payable to the Commissioner of Taxation and Finance. He also ordered him to pay his wife $10,000 in attorney’s fees and more than $2,400 in travel expenses. Rigler acted under Section 130 of the New York Court Rules and Regulations, authorizing judges to impose sanctions and award costs when a party engages in conduct “undertaken primarily … to harass or maliciously injure another.” Mr. Schaeffer, Rigler said, used his lawyer and the court as “pawn[s]” in a scheme to force his wife into a settlement not possible under New York law. WEDDING AS BACKDROP TO DIVORCE ACTION Rigler indicated that he was especially offended that Mr. Schaeffer used his wife’s brother’s wedding as the backdrop to his plan to move the divorce litigation from New York to Israel. “[H]arsh as the … relief may appear, it is really insufficient to make the plaintiff-wife and her family whole,” he wrote. “Weddings are committed to the memory by actual tangible reminders photo albums, videotaped highlights, gifts, and even the plastic bride and groom figures that traditionally adorn wedding cakes, among other souvenirs,” Rigler wrote. “Here, however, defendant-husband made this wedding unforgettable by nefarious reminders: process-servers, writs and injunctions.” The opinion was the last by Rigler before his retirement, he said in a letter accompanying the decision. Ms. Schaeffer was represented by Martin E. Friedlander of the Israel Goldberg law firm in Brooklyn. Mr. Schaeffer’s attorney was Leo Kimmel of Brooklyn.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.