A contractual right to use an Internet domain name is the product of a contract for services and cannot be subject to garnishment, the Virginia Supreme Court held April 21 in reversing the judgment of the circuit court (Network Solutions Inc. v. Umbro International Inc., Va., No. 991168, 4/21/00).

In 1997, Umbro International Inc. obtained a default judgment and permanent injunction in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina against 3263851 Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation — the judgment debtor — and also against a Canadian citizen who owned the judgment debtor. The proceeding involved the judgment debtor’s registration of the Internet domain name “umbro.com.” In its order, the district court permanently enjoined the judgment debtor from further use of the domain name “umbro.com” and awarded judgment to Umbro in the amount of $23,489.98 for attorneys’ fees and expenses.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]