Late last summer, New York’s Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy landed its biggest litigation matter in years from Chase Manhattan Bank, once its most important client. The firm spent the next several months arguing that Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, the counsel in a related case, had a conflict — and needed to be replaced. But in the end the judge ruled that Paul, Weiss could stay in. The only firm thrown out of the litigation was Milbank.

The case has a tangled history. In 1996 a copper trader for the Sumitomo Corporation confessed that he had engaged in a fraudulent ten-year trading scheme, involving more than 40 financial institutions, that had cost the Japanese trading company more than $2 billion. Last summer Sumitomo filed fraud suits against Chase and J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, alleging that the banks had abetted the trading scheme.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]