California's employment lawyers have been waiting three years for the state Supreme Court to issue a ruling defining the parameters of at-will employment. But two weeks ago the court again put the three-year-old Guz v. Bechtel case on hold pending the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products , a case that could reset the balance of power under the Seventh Amendment.
May 03, 2000 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
California’s employment lawyers have been waiting three years for the state Supreme Court to issue a ruling defining the parameters of at-will employment.
Fired Bechtel National Inc. employee John Guz has been waiting more than seven years for his day in court.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
