Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A winning plaintiff in an age-discrimination case is entitled to a court-ordered enhancement of a jury verdict, a federal magistrate judge in Pennsylvania ruled. The judge added more than $38,000 to a jury's verdict of $519,068 to compensate for the "negative tax consequences" of receiving a lump-sum award for back pay and front pay in a single year, instead of spreading the income over several years.
August 01, 2000 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS