If you want to tape-record a phone conversation without telling the person on the other end — a violation of Pennsylvania’s wiretap law — all you have to do is call from a different state, according to a recent opinion from the state Superior Court.

In an apparent case of first impression from a Pennsylvania appellate court, a three-judge panel ruled that because New York state’s wiretap law doesn’t require disclosure of taping to the receiver of a call, a conversation that was recorded without the defendant’s knowledge was admissible in a Pennsylvania court.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]