How much jurors should know about the financial consequences of their verdicts was the question before the New Jersey state Supreme Court January 3.

In a Consumer Fraud Act suit, the plaintiff’s lawyer asked the justices to overturn an Appellate Division ruling that jurors should be told that compensatory damage awards are subject to mandatory tripling and an award of attorneys’ fees to the plaintiff.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]