How much jurors should know about the financial consequences of their verdicts was the question before the New Jersey state Supreme Court last week. In a Consumer Fraud Act suit, the plaintiff's lawyer asked the justices to overturn an Appellate Division ruling that jurors should be told compensatory damage awards are subject to mandatory tripling and an award of attorneys' fees to the plaintiff.
January 13, 2000 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
How much jurors should know about the financial consequences of their verdicts was the question before the New Jersey state Supreme Court January 3.
In a Consumer Fraud Act suit, the plaintiff’s lawyer asked the justices to overturn an Appellate Division ruling that jurors should be told that compensatory damage awards are subject to mandatory tripling and an award of attorneys’ fees to the plaintiff.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
