Eli Attia, an architect, submitted preliminary drawings for the renovation of New York Hospital. He was not, however, chosen as the architect to design the final project. That honor went to a consortium of three other architectural firms. The plans subsequently submitted by those firms, Attia alleged, unlawfully copied his drawings. Attia sued the firms and the hospital for copyright infringement and reverse passing off under the Lanham Act.

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment for the defendants, concluding that no reasonable jury could find for the plaintiff on any of his claims. The Second Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Pierre N. Leval, affirmed.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]