Disqualification is not necessary just because a lawyer is a “necessary witness” in a case if another lawyer is ready to take the reins when the case goes to trial, a federal judge in Pennsylvania has ruled.

“An attorney may continue to represent a client in an action in which he will be called as a witness up to the actual trial in the case,” U.S. District Judge John R. Padova wrote in his five-page opinion in George v. Wausau Insurance Co.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]