The automatic stay set forth in Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code does not apply to an action for damages for post-petition patent infringement or an action to enjoin such infringement, a federal judge ruled Feb. 3 (Larami Limited v. Yes! Entertainment Corp., et al., No. 99-2851, D. N.J.).

U.S. Judge Joseph E. Irenas of the District of New Jersey denied a motion by Infinity Investors Ltd. to enforce the automatic stay provision to bar a patent infringement action brought by Larami Limited against Yes! Entertainment Corp. However, the judge granted a motion to transfer venue to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, where Yes! Entertainment’s Chapter 11 petition is pending.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]