A whistleblower accusing a federal contractor of fraud is entitled to an award only if any government recovery stems from information that was not public when the whistleblower filed suit, a federal appellate court has ruled.

On Feb. 29, a unanimous three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck a district judge’s decision to give three qui tam whistleblowers $52 million of a $325 million payment that SmithKline Beecham Corp. agreed to make to settle a federal False Claims Act suit in 1996. Merena v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., No. 98-1497.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]