Monday-morning quarterbacking and second-guessing is inevitable whenever the prosecution loses a big case, as the Bronx District Attorney did on Friday in the Amadou Diallo shooting trial.

The buzz among court observers in Albany is that prosecutors should have offered rebuttal witnesses. Observers said prosecutors should have aggressively cross-examined the defendants, asking questions like, “When you see a person of color, you see a threat, don’t you?” They also said the prosecution should have put a human face on Amadou Diallo, as the defense so skillfully did for the four police officer defendants.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]