A state Appeals Court ruling in Massachusetts may provide a loophole for cybercriminals. In a case involving a teacher who allegedly asked a student for sex through handwritten notes, the court ruled the three notes don't fall into the state's obscenity statutes. The court found that the handwritten notes do not meet the definition of "dissemination" because a machine did not mass-produce them.
February 23, 2000 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A recent state Appeals Court ruling in Massachusetts may provide a loophole for cybercriminals.
Last week, the Appeals Court ruled that three handwritten notes don’t fall into the state’s obscenity statutes. The case involves a teacher who allegedly asked a student for sex through handwritten notes.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
