A total of 16 telephone calls from consumers expressing their feelings about finding McDonald’s “Teeny Beanie Babies” for sale on a home shopping network did not raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether consumers were likely to be confused as to McDonald’s sponsorship or approval of the sales, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee held Feb. 2, granting the defendants summary judgment on the fast food giant’s unfair competition claim (McDonald’s Corp. v. Shop At Home Inc., M.D. Tenn., No. 3:99-0438, 2/2/00).

Judge Aleta A. Truger, writing for the court, also held that there were no material facts in dispute negating the defendants’ defense under the “first sale” doctrine.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]