Twice during oral arguments Wednesday in an emotional right-to-die case, Justice Richard Sims of California’s 3rd District Court of Appeals raised a simple, yet difficult question.
Why shouldn’t someone have to prove by clear and convincing evidence that their decision to terminate life support for someone else who can no longer speak for himself was made in good faith and based on sound medical advice?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]