A $3.2 million penalty against Westinghouse Electric Corp. was not excessive for the company's years of dumping chemical solvents and violating Pennsylvania's Clean Streams Law, a state appellate court ruled. The court sided with the Department of Environmental Protection's assessment that the penalty was warranted because of the "number, seriousness and duration of the violations."
February 14, 2000 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A multimillion-dollar penalty against Westinghouse Electric Corp. was not excessive for the company’s years of dumping chemical solvents and violating the Clean Streams Law, the Commonwealth Court has ruled.
The court sided with the Department of Environmental Protection’s assessment that the penalty was warranted because of the “number, seriousness and duration of the violations.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
