An employer engaged in the alarm service business did not violate Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 by recording all incoming and outgoing telephone calls because such recording was conducted in the ordinary course of business and reflected industry-wide practice, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Jan. 21 (Arias v. Mutual Central Alarm Service Inc., 2d Cir., No. 99-7240, 1/21/00).

The employer was not required to notify employees that it was recording calls in order to claim the business exception absent evidence showing that providing notice was common in the industry, the court said.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]