The chances of ending a ban on affirmative action in Texas college admissions any time soon diminished after the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' decided not to sit en banc for the latest appeal of Hopwood v. Texas. The court said since no member of the panel nor judge in regular active service on the court requested that the court be polled on hearing the case en banc, the state's motion was denied.
February 08, 2000 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Hopes of ending a ban on affirmative action in Texas college admissions any time soon was dashed by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision not to sit en banc for the latest appeal of Hopwood v. Texas.
In a Jan. 31 order, the court said since no member of the panel nor judge in regular active service on the court requested that the court be polled on hearing the case en banc, the state’s motion was denied.
Deal Watch: Skadden, Sidley, Slaughter and S&C Lead Big Paper Deal, While Private Funds Grow Massive
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
