Rarely does the securities industry have an opportunity to assess the scope of the First Amendment, but the Securities and Exchange Commission’s recent complaint, filed on Jan. 5, 2000 [FOOTNOTE 1] against “Tokyo Joe,” the Internet guru of day traders, raises a legitimate First Amendment issue: To what extent does the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 apply to websites that dispense stock tips and other short-term trading advice to their paying subscribers?

If it is fully applicable, then arguably its requirement that a non-exempt investment adviser must register with the SEC constitutes an impermissible prior restraint on speech.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]