In a highly unusual confrontation, a Southern District judge and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Manhattan are at loggerheads over the accuracy of a court transcript of the judge’s jury charge in a headline-grabbing criminal case involving leaders and lawyers of the New York City transit police union.

On April 8, Mark F. Pomerantz, chief of the U.S. Attorney’s Criminal Division, filed a sworn statement with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit asserting that Judge Deborah A. Batts’s chambers had amended the transcript of her charge in the Transit Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association case, putting it at odds with what she actually said when she delivered the charge on Jan. 22, 1998.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]