Mammoth litigation often works like a war of attrition, with combatants wearing each other down until a victor eventually emerges. But the landmark antitrust case against Microsoft may be more like a war played on a computer -- one where the screen reads, "Game Over." U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson tilted the game for the government when he labeled Microsoft a predatory monopolist in his findings of fact.
November 15, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Mammoth litigation often works like a war of attrition, with combatants wearing each other down until a victor eventually emerges.
But the landmark antitrust case against Microsoft Corp. may be more like a war played on a computer — one whose screen says, “Game Over.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
