The transforming effect of the Supreme Court’s opinion last year in the same-sex harassment case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services Inc., 523 U.S. 75, 118 S. Ct. 998 (1998), has made itself clear in several recent decisions from the federal appellate courts. Not surprisingly, Oncale has been applied primarily in opposite-sex cases and has caused the courts to rewrite some of the basic rules of sex harassment litigation.

Plaintiffs may now present their cases to juries even though the on-the-job misconduct allegedly targeted at them included little or no sexual content whatsoever. As a result of Oncale, a far greater number of harassment claims have been made viable. But many employers remain in the dark, still believing that hostile environment sexual harassment must include at least some tawdry conduct of a sexual nature.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]