The most intriguing aspect of Olmstead v. L.C. and E.W. , won't be found in the briefs or, probably, even in the April 21 oral arguments. Instead, take a look at the correspondence file at the U.S. Supreme Court. In this case, which tests the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act for state care of the mentally disabled, the file includes an extraordinary batch of letters from state attorneys general, all withdrawing from participation as amici curiae .
April 19, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The most intriguing aspect of Olmstead v. L.C. and E.W., No. 98-536, won’t be found in the briefs or, probably, even in the April 21 oral arguments.
Instead, take a look at the correspondence file at the Supreme Court, usually the repository of routine letters to and from the court about argument dates and filing deadlines.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
