Texas plaintiffs' lawyers say some of the terms of the $3.75 billion national settlement for users of the diet-drug combination fen-phen are too lean and plan to opt out en masse. Lawyers who object to the settlement say while the medical monitoring plan for fen-phen users who don't show any symptoms yet is good in some ways, the compensation plan for injured class members is woefully inadequate.
October 18, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Texas plaintiffs lawyers say some of the terms of the $3.75 billion national settlement for users of the diet-drug combination fen-phen are too lean and plan to opt out en masse.
Lawyers who object to the settlement say while the medical monitoring plan for fen-phen users who don’t show any symptoms yet is good in some ways, the compensation plan for injured class members is woefully inadequate.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
