A federal jury awarded more than $68 million to LePage's Inc. in its antitrust suit against 3M Corp. after finding that 3M illegally used its monopoly power to drive LePage's out of the market for transparent tape. But significantly, the jury cleared 3M on claims that it had engaged in exclusive dealing or unreasonably restrained trade. LePage's lawyers were elated and said they will also be filing a petition for attorney's fees and asking for injunctive relief against 3M in the coming weeks.
October 12, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A federal jury on Friday awarded more than $68 million to LePage’s Inc. in its antitrust suit against 3M Corp. after finding that 3M illegally used its monopoly power to drive LePage’s out of the market for transparent tape.
But significantly, the jury cleared 3M on claims that it had engaged in exclusive dealing or unreasonably restrained trade.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
