On Oct. 5, the Supreme Court willhear a campaign finance case with a catchy name: Nixon v. ShrinkMissouri Government PAC. As one of the 16 amicus briefs opens,3This is a case of great moment.2 It is also a case of missingthe moment. No amicus and no party even raises an issue that, initself, requires a remand: The Missouri statute unprecedentedlylimits PACs, infringing on the First Amendment right to freedomof association.
October 04, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
On Oct. 5, the Supreme Court will hear a campaign finance case with a catchy name: Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC, No. 98-963. As one of the 16 amicus curiae briefs opens, “This is a case of great moment.” It is also a case of missing the moment.
No amicus and no party even raises an issue that, in itself, requires a remand: The Missouri statute unprecedentedly limits political action committees, infringing on the First Amendment right to freedom of association.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
