Whether Long Island RailRoad officials had a legitimate reason for paying a female clerical workerless than her male counterparts � or whether this was merely a pretextfor gender discrimination � is genuine issue of fact that should have survivedsummary judgment, the Second Circuit has ruled.

A unanimous court found thatSouthern District Senior Judge Robert J. Ward erred in granting the LIRRsummary judgment on a claim under the Equal Pay Act, and the court remandedthe case for further proceedings in Belfi v LIRR, 98-9002.In 1990, Susan Belfi receiveda permanent appointment to the position of Office Engineer-Signal in theSignal Department at the LIRR and received a salary of $40,691. At thesame time, her Office-Engineer counterparts in the Communications and ElectricTraction division, both males, received $52,794 and $53,046 respectively.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]