Doctors and hospitals who voluntarily obtain informed consent for a procedure that does not require such consent may reconsider the practice in light of a recent federal district court opinion.

The Good Samaritan Doctrine, codified in Section 323 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, can support a negligence action against doctors or hospitals who “gratuitously” undertake the obligation to obtain a patient’s informed consent, federal district court Judge Thomas N. O’Neill Jr. said in Kotofsky v. American Red Cross.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]