U.S. District Judge Franklin S. Van Antwerpen believes that federal trial judges should be allowed to write opinions that explain their rulings after an appeal is filed — as state court trial judges in Pennsylvania and New Jersey do — so that appellate judges won’t be forced to guess or remand the case for t-crossing and i-dotting.

In an article published in the current volume of the Cardozo Law Review, Van Antwerpen and two of his former clerks, Jason H. Miller and Adam J. Wasserman, argue that a simple rule change — modeled on the Pennsylvania and New Jersey rules — would significantly reduce the workload of federal appellate judges.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]