In a case that may be more about agency politics than patent law, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) faced off against the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit at the Supreme Court on March 24. Dickinson v. Zurko, No. 98?377.

The high court was asked to determine how much deference the appeals court should give to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences and whether the board’s determinations should be reviewed under the “clear error” standard that the Federal Circuit uses or under the “abuse of discretion” standard mandated by the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]