Was Richard Herr’s workplace shooting spree at an Amtrak maintenance facility in April 1997 a “foreseeable catastrophe” that could have been prevented if Amtrak management had heeded the warning signs of imminent violence? Or was it a bizarre, out-of-character event that no one could possibly predict?

Those questions are at the heart of a civil case that goes to trial in U.S. District Court this morning in which the widow of a man killed by Herr is blaming Amtrak for its role in making the workplace unsafe.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]