Athough there’s “little doubt” that smoking cigarettes causescancer and a slew of other health problems, a federal appeals court has ruled that unionhealth and welfare funds cannot prove the tobacco industry caused them to spend more moneyon health care for workers.

“The tortured path that one must follow from the tobacco companies’alleged wrongdoing to the Funds’ increased expenditures demonstrates that the plaintiffs’claims are precisely the type of indirect claims that the proximate cause requirement isintended to weed out,” Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Edward R. Becker wrote in SteamfittersLocal Union No. 420 Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]