In a major win for the criminal defense bar, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the stiff sentences for money laundering should be imposed only in cases of “large scale drug money laundering or serious crime,” but not in run-of-the-mill fraud cases.

The ruling in United States v. J. David Smith and Steven Dandrea promises to radically change the way white-collar crime is litigated in many cases by depriving prosecutors of one of the most formidable weapons in their arsenal.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]