Juries in medical malpractice cases must be instructed on the law of contributory negligence whenever there is any evidence that the patient’s own role in the decision-making process was a proximate cause of her injuries, a divided panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.
Overturning a judgment of nearly $900,000, the court ordered a new trial in Alexander v. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in which three doctors were found liable for the death of a 17-year-old girl with a rare liver disorder, because the trial judge didn’t instruct the jury to consider the possible negligence of the girl and her parents in turning down available transplant livers on three occasions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]