The families of victims massacred by a gunman at 101 California St. in San Francisco in 1993 asked a California appeals court on Thursday to do what no U.S. appellate court has ever done: hold a gun manufacturer liable for manufacturing a deadly assault weapon. With a handful of victims' relatives in attendance, the appellate panel gave the plaintiffs' attorney ample time to make his case in two and a half hours of oral argument.
July 23, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The families of victims massacred by a gunman at 101 California St. in 1993 asked a California appeal court on Thursday to do what no U.S. appellate court has ever done: hold a gun manufacturer liable for manufacturing a deadly assault weapon.
With a handful of victims’ relatives in attendance, a First District Court of Appeal panel gave the plaintiffs’ attorney ample time to make his case in 21/2 hours of oral argument in Merrill v. Navegar, A079863.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
