Employing a narrow reading of the recent Supreme Court cases on defining disabilities, a federal judge has held that corrective measures — such as medication or eyeglasses — act as a bar to filing suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act only when they “fully control” a person’s impairment.

In some cases, Senior U.S. District Judge Thomas N. O’Neill said, the plaintiff cannot meet the ADA’s definition of “person with a disability” since the corrective measure eliminates all substantial impairments, such as eyeglasses that restore a person to 20/20 vision.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]