WASHINGTON — Ask anyone who has tried trawling through 1,000 matches returned by an Internet search of databases, and you’ll hear: Too much information can leave one as muddled as too little, unless it’s intelligently arranged.

The rules to protect such databases from poaching or other untoward competition have been equally murky since the Supreme Court rejected copyright protection for fact compilations in 1991. Two bills are pending in separate committees in the U.S. House of Representatives that may resolve the issues arising from the subsequent use of databases by unauthorized users.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]