Land use law can be seen as a great contest between the rights of the individual and the rights of society.

As a result of a recent Connecticut Supreme Court decision, Thomas v. West Haven, the game may become a fairer one for property owners. The decision recognizes a possible violation of the federal civil rights statute, known as Section 1983, which extends the rights of the U.S. Constitution to individuals. The surprising thing is that the plaintiffs’ victory is based on the equal protection clause, seldom a winner in such land use cases.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]