The recent decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board canceling the Washington Redskins’ trademark registrations on the grounds that they “disparage” American Indians, is more than a victory for political correctness. It is an omen that trademark law is on a collision course with the First Amendment.

Most of the Board’s cases involve charges that the mark under consideration is confusingly similar to another party’s. But the Lanham Act also provides for cancellation of marks which are “immoral,” “scandalous,” or which “disparage persons” or “bring them into contempt or disrepute.” This provision is rarely used. Indeed, for 50 years after passage of the act, not a single decision involving cancellation of a registration on the grounds that it “disparage[s] persons” was reported.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]