Clarifying New York's "borrowing statute," the Court of Appeals yesterday held that a nonresident plaintiff's breach of contract claim is subject to the statute of limitations of its home state. Although the disputed contract was negotiated, signed and carried out in New York, the Court rejected a "grouping of contacts" analysis and held that a nonresident plaintiff's cause of action accrues where it suffers the economic injury, generally its state of residence.
June 10, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
ALBANY — Clarifying New York’s “borrowing statute,” the Court of Appeals yesterday held that a nonresident plaintiff’s breach of contract claim is subject to the statute of limitations of its home state.
Although the disputed contract was negotiated, signed and carried out in New York, the Court rejected a “grouping of contacts” analysis and held that a nonresident plaintiff’s cause of action accrues where it suffers the economic injury, generally its state of residence.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
