ALBANY — Clarifying New York’s “borrowing statute,” the Court of Appeals yesterday held that a nonresident plaintiff’s breach of contract claim is subject to the statute of limitations of its home state.

Although the disputed contract was negotiated, signed and carried out in New York, the Court rejected a “grouping of contacts” analysis and held that a nonresident plaintiff’s cause of action accrues where it suffers the economic injury, generally its state of residence.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]