The U.S. Supreme Court has denied CNN's request for certiorari from a 9th Circuit ruling exposing the cable company to liability for invading a Montana couple's privacy, CNN v. Berger. In a related action, the justices had previously ruled that federal agents likely violated the Fourth Amendment's guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure by letting a CNN crew accompany the feds on a raid on the couple's ranch.
June 02, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The U.S. Supreme Court has turned a deaf ear to CNN’s attempt to undo a lower court ruling exposing it to liability for invading a Montana couple’s privacy.
In part two of a closely watched case dealing with media ride-alongs, the justices on Tuesday denied the cable network’s request for certiorari from a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision. CNN v. Berger, No. 97-1914 (U.S. June 1, 1999).
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
