A U.S. Supreme Court decision endorsing Federal Trade Commission authority over some nonprofit professional groups could have another long-term consequence because of its cautious approach to the use of the so-called quick look analysis of anti-competitive restraints. Agencies or courts can apply an abbreviated rule-of-reason analysis to restrictions that are not per se unlawful but are facially anti-competitive.
June 07, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A U.S. Supreme Court decision endorsing Federal Trade Commission authority over some nonprofit professional groups could have another long-term consequence because of its cautious approach to the use of the so-called quick look analysis of anti-competitive restraints.
“This is the first time the Supreme Court has ever put the brakes on quick look,” says antitrust lawyer Roy T. Englert Jr. of the Washington, D.C., office of Chicago’s Mayer, Brown & Platt.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
