An ex-husband could not use an addendum to his divorce agreement to reduce his alimony payments, the Pa. Superior Court has ruled, because he promised his ex-wife the addition was only to make him look good on paper. The addendum was unenforceable not only because neither party intended for it to be binding but because it was used to perpetrate a fraud, the court said.
May 24, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The suspension of state legislators’ pay while budget negotiations remain stalled violates constitutional separation of powers principles, a State Supreme Court justice in Brooklyn ruled on Friday.
Justice Richard D. Huttner’s ruling declared unconstitutional a law barring legislators from collecting their paychecks when wrangling among the two houses of the State Legislature and the Governor delays adoption of a budget beyond the April 1 start of the state’s fiscal year.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
