Not content with an order of public censure against a Manhattan lawyer who called a federal judge "corrupt" in a telephone conference, the Appellate Division, First Department, has suspended the lawyer for three months, imposing a more stringent sanction than that imposed by the U.S. District Court.
May 20, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Not content with an order of public censure against a Manhattan lawyer who called a federal judge “corrupt” in a telephone conference, the Appellate Division, First Department, has suspended the lawyer for three months, imposing a more stringent sanction than that imposed by the U.S. District Court.
Philip J. Dinhofer was suspended yesterday by a unanimous ruling of a five-judge panel for his remarks in an April 7, 1997, telephone conference with U.S. District Court Judge Loretta Preska.
Deal Watch: Skadden, Sidley, Slaughter and S&C Lead Big Paper Deal, While Private Funds Grow Massive
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
