When it comes to insurance coverage cases, the California Supreme Court is getting about as easy to read as a Rorschach test. The court is increasingly fractured when making insurance law and some justices are shuttling between the policyholder and insurer divide. That murkiness is underscored by Monday's decision in PPG Industries Inc. v. Transamerica Insurance Co., in which a typically pro-policyholder minority justice wrote the majority 4-3 opinion and a pro-insurer justice joined the dissenters.
May 11, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
When it comes to insurance coverage cases, the California Supreme Court is getting about as easy to read as a Rorschach test.
The court is increasingly fractured when it comes to making insurance law. And some individual justices are shuttling back and forth unpredictably between the policyholder and insurer divide.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
