A defendant in a personal injury action cannot grill the plaintiff in a second pretrial deposition before turning over its video surveillance tapes of the allegedly injured litigant, a state judge in Manhattan has ruled, unless the defendant shows the plaintiff’s testimony was inadequate to cover the issues raised by the tapes.

Justice Karla Moskowitz ruled from the bench last month in a medical malpractice action, Bernstone v. New York University Medical Center, and issued a written opinion filed in Supreme Court, New York County, IA Part 26, 119057/95. The matter had come up on the eve of trial when counsel for a surgeon, Dr. Jordan Brown, who was accused of botching two procedures while treating Alvin Bernstone for prostate cancer, demanded another deposition of Mr. Bernstone before turning over surveillance tapes as required by New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules �3101(i).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]