The law governing the arbitrationof employment discrimination disputes has undergone a remarkable evolutionduring the past nine years. At the beginning of the 1990′s the U.S. SupremeCourt, in Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., [FOOTNOTE 1] endorsed arbitration as an acceptable forum in which employers could compelemployees to resolve their statutory age discrimination claims.

In doing so, the Court rejectedchallenges to the adequacy of arbitration and its procedures as the byproductof an antiquated and out-of-favor hostility towards arbitration as a meansto resolve statutory claims.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]