Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

As employers and their counsel constantly look for ways to decrease litigation costs and minimize the risks of unfavorable outcomes at trial, an old weapon in the federal litigation arsenal may be gaining renewed interest in the employment field as an effective tool to encourage settlement. Specifically, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 establishes a cost-shifting mechanism — known as the “offer of judgment” — by which a party who rejects a settlement offer but later recovers a lesser award at trial is both precluded from recovering his own costs and is liable for the other party’s costs incurred following the time that the “offer of judgment” is made.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.